We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Original Investigation |

Necitumumab in Metastatic Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Establishing a Value-Based Cost

Daniel A. Goldstein, MD1; Qiushi Chen, BSc2; Turgay Ayer, PhD2; David H. Howard, PhD1,3; Joseph Lipscomb, PhD1,3; Suresh S. Ramalingam, MD1; Fadlo R. Khuri, MD1; Christopher R. Flowers, MD, MS1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
2H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
3Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(9):1293-1300. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3316.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Importance  The SQUIRE trial demonstrated that adding necitumumab to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic squamous cell lung cancer (mSqCLC) increased median overall survival by 1.6 months (hazard ratio, 0.84). However, the costs and value associated with this intervention remains unclear. Value-based pricing links the price of a drug to the benefit that it provides and is a novel method to establish prices for new treatments.

Objective  To evaluate the range of drug costs for which adding necitumumab to chemotherapy could be considered cost-effective.

Design, Setting, and Participants  We developed a Markov model using data from multiple sources, including the SQUIRE trial, which compared standard chemotherapy with and without necitumumab as first-line treatment of mSqCLC, to evaluate the costs and patient life expectancies associated with each regimen. In the analysis, patients were modeled to receive gemcitabine and cisplatin for 6 cycles or gemcitabine, cisplatin, and necitumumab for 6 cycles followed by maintenance necitumumab. Our model’s clinical inputs were the survival estimates and frequency of adverse events (AEs) described in the SQUIRE trial. Log-logistic models were fitted to the survival distributions in the SQUIRE trial. The cost inputs included drug costs, based on the Medicare average sale prices, and costs for drug administration and management of AEs, based on Medicare reimbursement rates (all in 2014 US dollars).

Main Outcomes and Measures  We evaluated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for the use of necitumumab across a range of values for its cost. Model robustness was assessed by probabilistic sensitivity analyses, based on 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations, sampling values from the distributions of all model parameters.

Results  In the base case analysis, the addition of necitumumab to the treatment regimen produced an incremental survival benefit of 0.15 life-years and 0.11 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The probabilistic sensitivity analyses established that when necitumumab cost less than $563 and less than $1309 per cycle, there was 90% confidence that the ICER for adding necitumumab would be less than $100 000 per QALY and less than $200 000 per QALY, respectively.

Conclusions and Relevance  These findings provide a value-based range for the cost of necitumumab from $563 to $1309 per cycle. This study provides a framework for establishing value-based pricing for new oncology drugs entering the US marketplace.

Figures in this Article


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 1.
Markov Model Simulating Outcomes for the SQUIRE Trial14

State transition probabilities were based on progression-free survival for the standard chemotherapy arm (a), overall survival for the standard chemotherapy arm (b), progression-free survival for the chemotherapy plus necitumumab arm (c), and overall survival for the chemotherapy plus necitumumab arm (d).

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 2.
Necitumumab Cost-Effectiveness Curves Varying Willingness to Pay (WTP)

ICER indicates incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

Graphic Jump Location
Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure 3.
Modelled Relationships Between Variation in Hazard Ratio (HR) for Survival and the Cost-Effectiveness of Necitumumab at Various Costs

Baseline was set at an HR of 0.85. ICER indicates incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; QALY, quality-adjusted life-year.

Graphic Jump Location




Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles